Promoting the Social Acceptance of Young Children With Moderate–Severe Intellectual Disabilities Using Cooperative-Learning Techniques

Author(s):  
Maureen Piercy ◽  
Keri Wilton ◽  
Michael Townsend
1984 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Slavin ◽  
Nancy A. Madden ◽  
Marshall Leavey

This study examines the effects on mainstreamed academically handicapped students of an instructional method, Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), that combined cooperative learning with individualized instruction in mathematics. Eighteen classes (grades 3–5) in six schools were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: TAI; individualized instruction (II) without cooperative teams; or control. The 117 academically handicapped students in these classes served as the subjects. The TAI and II methods both had significantly positive effects on the social acceptance of academically handicapped students by their nonhandicapped classmates, on their attitudes toward math, and on teacher ratings of their behavior. No achievement differences were found, although students as a whole (handicapped and nonhandicapped) in TAI and II classes achieved more than control students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Klang ◽  
Ingrid Olsson ◽  
Jenny Wilder ◽  
Gunilla Lindqvist ◽  
Niclas Fohlin ◽  
...  

Concerning challenges with the social inclusion of children with special educational needs (SEN), it is imperative to evaluate teacher interventions that promote social inclusion. This study aimed to investigate the effects of cooperative learning (CL) intervention on social inclusion. In addition, it was investigated to what degree CL implementation affected the outcomes. Fifty-six teachers of 958 fifth-grade children were randomly selected to intervention and control groups upon recruitment to the study. The intervention teachers received training and coaching in CL and implemented this approach three to four times a week for 15 weeks. The results showed a significant but small effect of CL on children’s social acceptance, but no significant effect on children’s friendships and perceptions of classroom relationships. The degree of CL implementation had effect on children’s social acceptance, but the effect was not consistent across social acceptance measures as a friend or a groupmate. Thus, it can be concluded that CL, conducted with the length and intensity of this study, may not lead to substantial changes in the social inclusion of children with SEN. In future studies, more focus needs to be devoted to teacher implementation of the CL approach.


2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary N. Siperstein ◽  
Gary C. Glick ◽  
Robin C. Parker

Abstract The social acceptance of children with and without intellectual disabilities was examined in an inclusive, summer recreational program. Participants were 67 children entering Grades 3 through 6, of which 29 were identified as having a mild intellectual disability. Children were recruited from economically and racially diverse urban school districts. Results showed that children with and without intellectual disabilities were equally accepted by their peers. Specifically, 95% of children without intellectual disabilities indicated that they liked to “hang out with” at least 1 child with an intellectual disability. Results also indicated that the majority of children without intellectual disabilities made at least 1 new friend with another child with an intellectual disability. The features of recreational programming that promote social inclusion are discussed.


Author(s):  
Raissa Citra Ellena ◽  
Dewi Retno Suminar

This quasi-experimental study used nonrandomized control group pretest posttest design, aiming to find out whether cooperative learning techniques numbered heads together effectively improved social skills in kindergarten students. The result of statistical test by using mann whitney and wilcoxon test showed significant 0,005 (<0,05) indicating that there is difference of social skill in research subject before and after implementation. This suggests that cooperative learning techniques numbered heads together effectively improve the social skills of kindergarten students both on aspects of communication, cooperation, assertiveness, responsibility, empathy, self-involvement and self-control.


2002 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Darnon ◽  
Céline Buchs ◽  
Fabrizio Butera

When interacting on a learning task, which is typical of several academic situations, individuals may experience two different motives: Understanding the problem, or showing their competences. When a conflict (confrontation of divergent propositions) emerges from this interaction, it can be solved either in an epistemic way (focused on the task) or in a relational way (focused on the social comparison of competences). The latter is believed to be detrimental for learning. Moreover, research on cooperative learning shows that when they share identical information, partners are led to compare to each other, and are less encouraged to cooperate than when they share complementary information. An epistemic vs. relational conflict vs. no conflict was provoked in dyads composed by a participant and a confederate, working either on identical or on complementary information (N = 122). Results showed that, if relational and epistemic conflicts both entailed more perceived interactions and divergence than the control group, only relational conflict entailed more perceived comparison activities and a less positive relationship than the control group. Epistemic conflict resulted in a more positive perceived relationship than the control group. As far as performance is concerned, relational conflict led to a worse learning than epistemic conflict, and - after a delay - than the control group. An interaction between the two variables on delayed performance showed that epistemic and relational conflicts were different only when working with complementary information. This study shows the importance of the quality of relationship when sharing information during cooperative learning, a crucial factor to be taken into account when planning educational settings at the university.


2019 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-45

The society of medieval Europe had specific expectations for marriageable girls. From an early age girls were taught how to be wives and mothers, for example by being entrusted with the care of their younger siblings. The girls learned everything they would need in the future by observation. According to the teachings of preachers and writers at the time, girls, irrespective of their social status, were not meant to remain idle, as there were fears that with too much free time on their hands, they might spend it contemplating their looks, practising gestures that were to attract the attention of men or spending time alone in the streets and squares, thus exposing themselves to a variety of dangers. A wife was expected to bear a lot of children, preferably boys, because the mortality rate among young children was high at the time. Wifely duties also included raising children, at least until they were taken over by, for example, a tutor hired by the father, managing the household and ensuring every possible comfort for the husband. As Gilbert of Tournai noted, it was the mother who was expected to bring up the children in faith and to teach them good manners. The duties of the wife obviously depended on her social standing — different duties were expected from the wives of noblemen than from women lower down on the social ladder, who often had to help their husbands, in addition to doing everyday chores.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document